Yes — and it’s one of the most disturbing examples of media bias and global injustice.

Western media gives more attention to European disasters than African genocides?

When tragedy strikes in Europe or North America — it dominates global headlines.
But when millions suffer or die in Africa, coverage is often late, limited, or entirely ignored.

For example:

• The 1994 Rwandan Genocide saw over 800,000 people slaughtered in 100 days — yet received minimal media attention until it was nearly over.

• The conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo has resulted in millions of deaths over two decades — but it's called “Africa’s forgotten war.”

• The Darfur crisis, Ethiopia's Tigray war, Boko Haram atrocities, and Sudan’s unfolding chaos barely make front-page news — while minor events in Europe are covered live and extensively.

Why the silence?

• Racial bias in what is seen as "newsworthy"

• Perceived distance from Western interests

• Colonial attitudes that treat African lives as less valuable

• Media houses prioritizing audience engagement over global responsibility

This disparity shapes public perception — and influences how governments respond to crises. Lives are lost not just from violence, but from being ignored.

Quote for Thought

“Some tragedies get headlines. Others get silence. But all lives matter — or none truly do.”
— Eyes on the Unseen