Greed-driven short-termism in American and European auto industries has created the very conditions for China to leapfrog them in electric vehicles (EVs).

1. The Greed Trap in Western Auto Industry

For decades, U.S. and European automakers focused on profits today over innovation tomorrow.

• SUV & Pickup Obsession (U.S.) → American automakers like Ford and GM maximized profits by pushing large gas-guzzling SUVs and trucks, because margins were higher than on small cars or early EVs. Instead of innovating, they milked the existing oil-based system.

• Dieselgate & Delays (Europe) → German brands like Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes clung to diesel, even resorting to cheating emissions tests (Dieselgate, 2015). They saw EVs as a threat to their luxury engine dominance and delayed transition.

• Quarterly Profits over Long-Term Vision → Shareholder capitalism demanded immediate returns. Investing billions into uncertain EV tech looked risky, so leadership avoided it.

Result: Western companies stayed locked in fossil fuel profits while China bet the future on EVs.

2. China’s Strategic Play

While Western automakers clung to old models, China went all-in on EVs with a national strategy:

• Government Policy – Subsidies, tax incentives, EV quotas, and massive charging infrastructure rollout.

• Battery Dominance – Chinese firms like CATL and BYD became global battery giants, controlling the most expensive and strategic EV component.

• Economies of Scale – Domestic competition (NIO, Xpeng, Li Auto, BYD, SAIC) forced innovation, pushing prices down and tech forward.

• Integration with Tech – Chinese EVs became smartphones on wheels, integrating AI, apps, and connectivity, appealing to a younger generation.

Today, BYD has overtaken Tesla in global EV sales, and Chinese EVs are flooding Europe, the Middle East, and Africa with cheaper, high-tech cars.

3. Why Catching Up Will Be Hard

American and European automakers face a brutal uphill battle:

1. Battery Dependence – China dominates battery supply chains, from mining lithium and cobalt to manufacturing. The West is years behind.

2. Cost Competitiveness – Chinese EVs are 30–40% cheaper than Western equivalents. Europe and the U.S. can’t match prices without subsidies or tariffs.

3. Innovation Gap – Chinese EVs lead in range, fast-charging, AI integration, and design. Western companies are still trying to retrofit old platforms.

4. Late Start – Companies like Ford and VW are only now building EV-dedicated factories, while BYD and Tesla already mass-produce millions annually.

5. Consumer Perception – In Europe, Chinese EVs are seen as affordable and modern. Western brands risk looking outdated, expensive, and slow.

4. The Geopolitical Angle

Western governments are scrambling to protect their auto industries:

• EU Tariffs on Chinese EVs – Brussels is considering tariffs to slow Chinese imports, but that only delays the inevitable.

• U.S. Inflation Reduction Act – Heavy subsidies for American EVs, but battery supply chains are still heavily reliant on China.

• Tech Nationalism – Attempts to block Chinese car tech (like Huawei’s smart systems) show desperation to defend Western automakers.

But none of these solve the fundamental issue: China planned for the EV future decades ago, while the West chased short-term profits.

5. The Bigger Picture: Greed vs. Vision

This isn’t just about cars. It’s a symbol of a wider economic divide:

• The West, driven by corporate greed, prioritized shareholder returns, stock buybacks, and fossil-fuel profits.

• China, driven by state-led industrial policy, prioritized long-term strategic dominance in emerging industries (EVs, batteries, solar, AI).

Now the results are visible: China owns the EV future, while U.S. and European automakers are scrambling for survival.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What “greed is good” did to America and Europe’s automakers is exactly what over-financialization always does: it sacrificed innovation for quarterly profits. Meanwhile, China built an entire EV ecosystem from the ground up.

It’s not just that China has beaten them—it’s that the gap may be unbridgeable without a radical shift in Western industrial strategy.