CCP Sponsored Chinese Fishing Militia/Pirates

Posted 2025-09-04 23:31:17

330

What are the specific international laws governing fishing in EEZs?

The legal framework for fishing in Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) is primarily governed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which is often referred to as the "constitution of the oceans."

This treaty, adopted in 1982, established a comprehensive legal regime for all marine activities, including the management of fisheries.

Here are the specific international laws and principles that govern fishing in EEZs under UNCLOS and other related agreements:

1. The Right of the Coastal State

Sovereign Rights: UNCLOS grants coastal states "sovereign rights" for the purpose of exploring and exploiting, conserving, and managing the natural resources, whether living or non-living, of the waters superjacent to the seabed and of the seabed and its subsoil.
Maximum Extent: The EEZ extends no more than 200 nautical miles from a country's baseline (the low-water line along the coast). Within this zone, the coastal state has the exclusive right to all marine resources.
Key Distinction: It's important to note that the EEZ is not the same as a country's territorial sea (which extends up to 12 nautical miles from the baseline). Within the territorial sea, the coastal state has full sovereignty, while in the EEZ, it has sovereign rights specifically over resources. The surface waters of the EEZ remain international waters, which means other countries have the freedom of navigation and overflight.

2. The Coastal State's Duties and Responsibilities

While UNCLOS grants a coastal state exclusive rights, it also imposes specific duties to ensure responsible management.

Conservation and Management: The coastal state has the obligation to determine the "allowable catch" of living resources in its EEZ. This means it must set limits to prevent overfishing and to maintain or restore fish populations to levels that can produce the maximum sustainable yield.
Promotion of Optimum Utilization: The coastal state must also promote the "objective of optimum utilization" of the living resources. This means that if the coastal state does not have the capacity to harvest the entire allowable catch, it must, through agreements or other arrangements, give other states access to the surplus.

3. Regulations on Foreign Vessels

Foreign fishing vessels can only operate in an EEZ under specific conditions:

Licensing and Agreements: Foreign vessels must have a license from the coastal state to fish within its EEZ. This is typically done through bilateral or multilateral agreements.
Compliance with Laws: Once a foreign vessel is given access, it must comply with the laws and regulations of the coastal state. These regulations can cover a wide range of issues, including:
- Species that can be caught.
- Quotas and catch limits.
- Areas where fishing is allowed.
- Types of fishing gear that can be used.
- Vessel registration and reporting requirements.
Enforcement: The coastal state has the right to enforce its laws in its EEZ. This includes the right to board, inspect, arrest, and prosecute foreign vessels that are suspected of violating its fishing regulations. Penalties for violations can include fines and confiscation of the vessel and its catch.

4. Other Relevant International Instruments

While UNCLOS is the foundation, other treaties and agreements supplement its provisions:

The Port State Measures Agreement (PSMA): This agreement, administered by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), is a crucial tool for combating illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. It allows a state to inspect foreign fishing vessels in its ports and to deny port access to those suspected of IUU fishing.
Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs): These are international bodies established by treaties to manage fish stocks in specific regions, particularly those that straddle multiple EEZs or are found on the high seas. They set quotas, establish conservation measures, and monitor fishing activities to prevent overexploitation.
United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement (UNFSA): This agreement focuses on highly migratory fish stocks and "straddling stocks" (those that occur both within an EEZ and on the high seas). It provides a framework for cooperation between coastal states and distant-water fishing nations to ensure the long-term sustainability of these shared resources.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What are some successful examples of community-led fisheries monitoring?

Community-led fisheries monitoring and management are proving successful across the globe, especially in areas where top-down government enforcement is weak. These initiatives empower local communities to protect their resources by combining traditional knowledge with modern technology and legal frameworks.

1. Locally Managed Marine Areas (LMMAs) - Fiji and the Philippines

LMMAs are a powerful model where coastal communities are given the authority to manage their own marine resources. In places like Fiji, communities have revived and formalized a traditional system called ra'ui (meaning 'restriction' or 'taboo'), which designated certain fishing grounds as temporary "no-take" zones.

How it works: Community leaders and fishermen decide which areas to close off to fishing, allowing fish populations to recover and reproduce. After a set period, the area is reopened.
Success: This model has led to a significant increase in both the size and abundance of fish, not only within the protected areas but also in surrounding waters. It has improved food security and the incomes of local fishermen.

2. The FISH-i Africa Task Force

This is a regional initiative that relies on a network of agencies to fight illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. While it involves government bodies, its success is driven by a cooperative approach that includes intelligence from local fishing communities and NGOs.

How it works: Local fishermen often spot illegal vessels and report them. This information is then cross-referenced with vessel tracking data and shared among the member nations of the task force (including Kenya, Tanzania, and Seychelles). This intelligence sharing allows them to identify and track vessels with a history of illegal activity.
Success: The task force has been instrumental in exposing and prosecuting dozens of cases of illegal fishing, denying port access to repeat offenders, and holding foreign vessels accountable for their actions.

3. Community-Based Fisheries Management (CBFM) - Bangladesh

Inland fishing communities in Bangladesh have adopted a CBFM model to manage their shared water resources. Faced with dwindling fish stocks, they established formal groups with the authority to manage local fishing areas.

How it works: Community organizations, with support from non-governmental organizations (NGOs), implement their own rules, such as setting up fish sanctuaries, establishing closed fishing seasons, and banning destructive gear. They are also responsible for enforcing these rules.
Success: The model has led to a significant increase in fish yields and a reduction in poverty among fishing communities. By providing alternative income opportunities, it has also increased compliance with seasonal fishing closures.

4. The ABALOBI App - South Africa

This is a unique example of technology empowering small-scale fishermen. ABALOBI is a mobile app and platform created to help artisanal fishermen in South Africa.

How it works: Fishermen use the app to log their daily catches, which creates a rich dataset for scientific and management purposes. It also allows them to sell their catch directly to restaurants and consumers, cutting out exploitative middlemen. The data they collect is used to inform management decisions and to prove the legality and sustainability of their catches.
Success: The app has not only provided a higher, fairer income for fishermen but has also created a verifiable chain of custody, boosting market access and providing a powerful tool for community-led data collection and monitoring.

What are the challenges in enforcing these community-led monitoring efforts?

Community-led fisheries monitoring, while showing great promise, faces significant challenges that can hinder its effectiveness and long-term sustainability. These challenges often relate to resources, legal authority, social dynamics, and the nature of the fishing industry itself.

Here are some of the key challenges in enforcing community-led monitoring efforts:

1. Lack of Legal Authority and Mandate

Weak Legal Standing: In many countries, the rules and regulations created by a community group or local fishing council may not have the force of national law. This makes it difficult to prosecute offenders, especially foreign vessels, who can simply ignore the community's rules without facing serious consequences.
Limited Enforcement Power: Community members lack the legal authority to arrest, detain, or fine violators. While they can report illegal activity, they are often dependent on overstretched and under-resourced government agencies (like coast guards or fisheries departments) to take action, which may not happen in a timely manner, if at all.

2. Resource and Financial Constraints

Lack of Funding: Monitoring and enforcement require significant financial resources for equipment (patrol boats, fuel, GPS devices), training, and communication. Small-scale fishing communities often operate with limited funds, making it difficult to sustain these efforts over the long term.
Difficulty of Surveillance: Covering vast marine areas with limited resources is a major challenge. The "ghost fleet" of illegal trawlers can operate at night or in remote areas, making them hard to spot and track with simple equipment.

3. Social and Political Dynamics

Internal Conflict: Communities are not monolithic. There can be disagreements over rules, leadership, and the distribution of benefits. Conflicts may arise between different fishing groups, or between those who are willing to comply with the rules and those who are not.
Corruption and Bribery: In some cases, foreign fishing companies may offer bribes to local leaders or community members to turn a blind eye to illegal activities. This can undermine the legitimacy of the entire monitoring effort and create deep divisions within the community.
External Pressure: Local communities can face intimidation or violence from organized criminal networks involved in illegal fishing. Fishermen who act as "eyes on the water" put themselves and their families at risk.

4. Technical and Data-Related Challenges

Data Collection and Analysis: While tools like smartphone apps are helping, collecting accurate and consistent data is still a challenge. Community members may lack the training to use these tools effectively or to analyze the data to inform their management decisions.
Coordination and Information Sharing: Even when data is collected, it must be shared with the appropriate government agencies or regional bodies. This process can be slow and inefficient, hindering a rapid response to illegal activities.

5. Lack of Alternative Livelihoods

Economic Incentives: When a community bans certain fishing practices or sets up a no-take zone, it can temporarily reduce the income of its members. Without viable alternative sources of income, such as eco-tourism or aquaculture, community members may feel pressured to break the rules to provide for their families.
Poverty Trap: Many fishing communities are caught in a poverty trap where a declining resource base forces them to fish harder, which further depletes the resource. This makes it difficult to implement and enforce conservation measures that require short-term sacrifice for long-term gain.

Overcoming these challenges requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves securing legal recognition and support from national governments, building strong partnerships with NGOs and international organizations, providing training and resources, and creating economic alternatives that make sustainable fishing a more attractive option than engaging in or tolerating illegal activities.

NGOs play a crucial and multi-faceted role in supporting community-led fisheries initiatives, acting as a bridge between local communities and larger institutional frameworks. Their support is essential in overcoming the challenges of legal authority, resources, and technical capacity.

Here are the specific ways NGOs support these community initiatives:

1. Capacity Building and Training

NGOs provide essential training to community members to help them manage their fisheries effectively. This can include:

Scientific Monitoring: Teaching fishermen how to collect data on fish stocks, species diversity, and water quality using simple but effective methods.
Technical Skills: Providing training on the use of modern technology, such as GPS devices, mobile apps (like ABALOBI), and satellite tracking systems, to monitor illegal fishing activities.
Management and Governance: Helping communities establish and operate their own management committees, develop regulations, and create governance structures that are fair and effective.

2. Providing Resources and Technology

Many community groups lack the funds for necessary equipment. NGOs often fill this gap by:

Donating Equipment: Providing essential gear such as patrol boats, binoculars, radios, and GPS units to enable on-the-ground monitoring.
Developing Technology: Creating custom-built technology, such as the ABALOBI app, that is specifically designed to meet the needs of small-scale fishermen, enabling them to track their catch and connect directly with markets.
Satellite Surveillance: Subscribing to commercial satellite services and using platforms like Global Fishing Watch to monitor vessel movements and share this data with local communities, allowing them to spot and report suspicious activity.

3. Legal and Policy Advocacy-

NGOs use their expertise and global networks to give a voice to local communities in larger policy discussions:

Lobbying Governments: They work with national governments to advocate for legal reforms that grant communities greater authority over their local marine resources.
International Advocacy: They raise awareness about the impact of illegal fishing on a global stage, putting pressure on distant-water fishing nations and their governments to take action. Organizations like the Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF) use their resources to publish reports and launch campaigns based on evidence collected at the community level.
Legal Aid: Some NGOs provide legal assistance to communities, helping them draft and enforce regulations or pursue legal action against foreign vessels and corporations engaged in illegal fishing.

4. Facilitating Market Access and Economic Alternatives-

Beyond monitoring, NGOs help communities build sustainable economic models:

Creating Supply Chains: By promoting transparency and traceability, they help connect small-scale fishermen directly with high-end restaurants, hotels, and markets. This ensures fishermen receive a fairer price for their catch and provides a powerful economic incentive for sustainable practices.
Developing Alternative Livelihoods: NGOs support communities in diversifying their income streams through activities like sustainable aquaculture, eco-tourism, and the creation of value-added seafood products, which reduces the economic pressure on overfished wild stocks.

5. Acting as a Neutral Intermediary-

NGOs often serve as a crucial, trusted third party in complex situations:

Bridging Trust Gaps: They can act as a bridge of trust between local communities and government agencies, helping to facilitate communication and collaboration where there may be a history of mistrust.
Promoting Collaboration: NGOs help foster networks and partnerships between different community groups and regional bodies, as seen in the FISH-i Africa Task Force, enabling a more coordinated and effective response to illegal fishing.

Please log in to like, share and comment!