Tribalisim in African Politics-

Why Talented Individuals Often Leave Their Home States or Countries Due to Ethnic Discrimination and Favoritism- 

Migration of talented individuals — often termed “brain drain” — has become a persistent challenge for many African countries. While economic opportunity, political instability, and security concerns contribute to this phenomenon, ethnic discrimination and favoritism are among the most potent yet under-discussed factors. When individuals perceive that their abilities, qualifications, and contributions will be undervalued or ignored because of their ethnic background, many choose to leave their home states or countries in search of fair treatment, opportunity, and professional growth. This migration has profound consequences, draining nations of the human capital necessary for development, innovation, and governance.

1. The Roots of Ethnic Discrimination and Favoritism

Ethnic discrimination in employment, public appointments, education, and business opportunities is deeply rooted in historical, social, and political contexts. In multi-ethnic states, the tendency for leaders to favor their own group can be traced back to both pre-colonial and colonial structures:

a. Historical and Colonial Legacies
Many African states were constructed artificially by colonial powers without regard for ethnic or cultural cohesion. The British, French, and Portuguese, for instance, ruled through indirect systems, favoring certain ethnic groups as intermediaries. These groups gained educational, political, and economic advantages, which sowed the seeds of long-term inequality. After independence, these patterns persisted: dominant ethnic groups maintained positions of power and continued privileging their own members, reinforcing discrimination against outsiders.

b. Political and Economic Patronage
Ethnic favoritism is often used as a political strategy to consolidate power. Leaders appoint members of their own ethnic groups to key government positions, award contracts preferentially to connected individuals, and allocate development projects along ethnic lines. Citizens outside the favored group experience systemic barriers to advancement in public service, business, and even social recognition, creating an environment where talent is ignored unless it aligns with ethnicity.

2. How Ethnic Discrimination Undermines Opportunity

Ethnic discrimination manifests in subtle and overt ways, creating structural disadvantages for individuals from marginalized groups:

a. Workplace Bias
Talented individuals often face biased recruitment, promotions, and evaluations. Qualified candidates may be overlooked for positions in favor of less skilled candidates from the dominant ethnic group. This leads to frustration, underutilization of skills, and disillusionment. In Nigeria, for example, allegations of ethnic favoritism in federal appointments and corporate leadership continue to alienate capable professionals from minority or less influential ethnic groups.

b. Limited Access to Education and Funding
Even educational and entrepreneurial opportunities are affected. Scholarships, grants, and business loans may be distributed along ethnic lines, making it difficult for talented individuals outside the favored group to access the resources they need to excel. This inequity discourages investment in personal development and stifles the growth of innovation.

c. Regional Inequalities
Certain states or regions are systematically neglected due to ethnic bias in policy and resource allocation. Professionals from these areas experience a double disadvantage: limited local opportunities and discrimination when seeking national positions. This combination incentivizes relocation to regions or countries where ethnicity is less of a barrier.

3. Psychological and Social Impacts Driving Migration

The decision to leave one’s home state or country is not purely economic; it is also deeply psychological. Ethnic discrimination and favoritism produce feelings of marginalization, resentment, and futility:

a. Erosion of Motivation
When talent is overlooked because of ethnicity, individuals lose faith in the fairness of institutions. No matter how competent or creative they are, success depends on identity rather than merit. Over time, this demotivates professionals, leading them to seek environments where their abilities are recognized.

b. Social Alienation
Discrimination fosters social exclusion. Talented individuals may feel isolated within professional and social networks dominated by the favored group. Exclusion from decision-making processes, leadership opportunities, and informal networks reinforces the perception that success is unattainable at home.

c. Desire for Recognition and Achievement
Talented individuals are naturally driven to apply their skills and achieve impact. If their home states or countries deny them avenues to realize their potential, leaving becomes a rational choice. Migration promises meritocratic environments where competence, creativity, and innovation are rewarded rather than ethnic affiliation.

4. Economic and Career Considerations

Ethnic favoritism directly limits professional and entrepreneurial advancement, prompting migration:

a. Career Stagnation
Qualified individuals may be trapped in positions below their skill level due to ethnic bias. This stagnation affects salaries, promotions, and professional development, making domestic career paths unappealing.

b. Entrepreneurship Barriers
Discrimination affects access to contracts, funding, and markets. Talented entrepreneurs may struggle to scale businesses or attract investment in a system that favors certain ethnic groups. Countries with ethnically skewed procurement and investment policies see fewer startups succeed outside elite circles.

c. Global Opportunities
The globalization of talent markets offers alternatives. Skilled professionals increasingly migrate to countries where merit, rather than ethnicity, determines opportunity. African IT specialists, engineers, medical professionals, and academics often relocate to Europe, North America, and Asia for better career prospects.

5. Case Examples Across Africa

Nigeria: Ethnic favoritism in government appointments, university admissions, and corporate leadership continues to drive talented professionals from minority or underrepresented ethnic groups to migrate to Europe, the Middle East, or North America.

Kenya: Kikuyu, Luo, and other ethnic tensions have historically affected political appointments and regional development, leading to migration among professionals seeking neutral environments.

South Africa: Post-apartheid affirmative action policies sometimes unintentionally marginalized non-target groups, causing skilled individuals to seek opportunities abroad where competence outweighs identity.

Sudan and South Sudan: Long-standing ethnic favoritism in government and military appointments contributed to civil conflict and forced many professionals and skilled workers to migrate to safer, more equitable regions.

6. Consequences of Talent Flight

a. Economic Loss
Countries lose skilled labor critical for innovation, public service, and industrial development. This affects national competitiveness, reduces productivity, and diminishes tax revenues.

b. Weakening of Institutions
Brain drain undermines governance, healthcare, education, and research institutions. Competent professionals are replaced with less qualified individuals who may align ethnically but lack capacity, perpetuating inefficiency and corruption.

c. Slowed Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurial ecosystems suffer when talented individuals leave. The economy becomes dependent on a narrow set of elites, reducing competition, creativity, and technological advancement.

d. Social Fragmentation
Migration also has social consequences. Communities lose role models and leaders, weakening civil society and social cohesion.

7. Addressing the Problem

To retain talent, states must implement policies that reduce ethnic discrimination:

• Merit-Based Recruitment: Appointments in government, civil service, and corporate sectors should prioritize qualifications over ethnicity.

• Transparent Funding: Scholarships, grants, and contracts must be allocated fairly and competitively.

• Anti-Discrimination Laws: Strong enforcement against ethnic bias in professional, academic, and entrepreneurial opportunities is essential.

• Inclusive Policies: Regional and ethnic diversity in appointments and economic opportunities should reflect fairness, not favoritism.

• Cultural Shift: Societal values must evolve to recognize merit and competence as primary determinants of success.

                     +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Talented individuals leave their home states or countries because ethnic discrimination and favoritism obstruct their potential. When access to jobs, promotions, funding, and opportunities is determined by identity rather than skill, professionals, innovators, and entrepreneurs are forced to seek meritocratic environments abroad. The consequences are profound: economic stagnation, weakened institutions, and a slowed pace of innovation.

For African nations to thrive, ethnic inclusivity and meritocracy must replace favoritism. Only by valuing talent over tribe can countries retain their skilled workforce, nurture innovation, and achieve sustainable development. Without this shift, brain drain will continue to deprive nations of the very individuals capable of driving transformation, leaving societies trapped in cycles of inefficiency, inequality, and lost potential.