Tribalism, the prioritization of one’s ethnic or tribal identity over broader national interest, has been a persistent challenge across Africa.

From the early colonial period to contemporary politics, ethnic loyalty has shaped governance, resource distribution, and social interactions, often undermining meritocracy, transparency, and equity.

In countries like Nigeria, where hundreds of ethnic groups coexist, tribalism manifests in elections, public appointments, contracts, business opportunities, and even law enforcement.

The question arises: can Nigeria and other African nations achieve lasting social cohesion and prosperity if tribalism is not systematically addressed at every level of governance?

The evidence suggests that without confronting tribalism comprehensively, the prospects for unity, stability, and sustainable development are severely compromised.

1. Tribalism as a Barrier to Social Cohesion

Social cohesion is the glue that binds societies together, ensuring mutual trust, shared values, and collective identity. Tribalism undermines this cohesion in several ways:

a. Erosion of Trust Among Citizens
When citizens perceive that government resources and opportunities are distributed based on ethnicity rather than merit, trust in institutions declines. People become wary of the motives of leaders from other tribes, fostering suspicion and rivalry. In Nigeria, perceptions of ethnic favoritism in federal appointments and resource allocation have repeatedly fueled inter-ethnic tension and unrest.

b. Polarization and Identity Politics
Tribalism encourages political mobilization along ethnic lines rather than on policy, competence, or ideology. Leaders exploit tribal loyalty to consolidate power, while citizens vote and support policies based on ethnic identity. This entrenches polarization, making it difficult to foster a sense of shared national purpose. Without cohesive governance, collaboration on national development projects, infrastructure, and social welfare programs is hindered.

c. Marginalization of Minority Groups
Ethnic favoritism often results in systematic neglect of minority groups. Regions dominated by smaller ethnic communities may experience underdevelopment, poor service delivery, and limited economic opportunities, fueling grievances that can escalate into conflict. In the absence of equitable governance, social cohesion remains fragmented, and resentment grows.

2. Tribalism and Its Impact on Governance

Effective governance requires meritocracy, transparency, and inclusivity. Tribalism compromises all three:

a. Nepotism and Patronage
Government offices and contracts are often awarded based on ethnic affiliation rather than competence. This reduces institutional efficiency, fosters corruption, and erodes public confidence in the ability of state agencies to deliver services. For example, when appointments are made to satisfy ethnic quotas rather than skill requirements, bureaucratic performance suffers, slowing economic and social development.

b. Policy Bias
Ethnically biased governance can skew policy implementation. Leaders may prioritize regions or communities aligned with their tribe, creating unequal access to infrastructure, healthcare, and education. This selective development perpetuates regional disparities, fuels grievances, and weakens national cohesion.

c. Conflict and Instability
Tribalism heightens the risk of violent conflict, particularly during elections, resource disputes, or political succession crises. In Nigeria, ethnically fueled violence in states such as Plateau, Benue, and Kaduna underscores the destructive potential of unchecked tribalism. Conflict drains economic resources, destabilizes societies, and discourages investment.

3. Economic Implications of Tribalism

Economic prosperity relies on equitable access to opportunities, fair competition, and innovation. Tribalism undermines all of these:

a. Inhibiting Meritocracy and Talent Utilization
When positions and contracts are awarded based on ethnicity, qualified individuals from outside favored groups are excluded. This reduces productivity, innovation, and the quality of governance. Talented citizens may migrate to other regions or countries where merit is recognized, resulting in a “brain drain.”

b. Distorting Market Competition
Tribal favoritism extends to business opportunities, with contracts, licenses, and permits sometimes awarded to relatives or ethnic allies of those in power. This creates monopolies, reduces competitiveness, and discourages entrepreneurship, limiting overall economic growth.

c. Perpetuating Regional Inequalities
Regions associated with minority or politically weaker ethnic groups often lag in infrastructure, education, and industrial development due to systemic neglect. These inequalities foster poverty cycles, inter-group resentment, and social fragmentation. Without inclusive governance, economic prosperity cannot be evenly distributed, and national development stalls.

4. The Interdependence of Social Cohesion and Prosperity

Social cohesion and economic prosperity are mutually reinforcing. A society fragmented by tribalism struggles to develop because:

• Investment and Economic Stability Are Undermined: Ethnic conflicts deter investors and disrupt markets.

• Human Capital Is Wasted: Talented individuals are sidelined or migrate due to discrimination.

• Public Trust in Institutions Is Eroded: Corruption and favoritism reduce compliance with policies and public initiatives, hampering service delivery.

Conversely, inclusive governance that transcends tribal lines fosters trust, cooperation, and national pride, enabling equitable economic development and sustainable growth.

5. The Necessity of Addressing Tribalism at Every Level of Governance

Partial reforms are insufficient. Tribalism must be addressed at all governance levels:

a. National Level
The federal government must establish and enforce merit-based recruitment, equitable resource distribution, and anti-tribalism laws. National unity campaigns, civic education, and inclusive national narratives can reduce ethnic polarization.

b. Regional and Local Governance
State and local governments should implement transparent and accountable systems that prioritize competence and fairness. Localized policies must avoid ethnic favoritism to prevent marginalization and inter-community tension.

c. Political Parties and Electoral Systems
Political parties must discourage ethnic-based candidate selection and focus on policies and competencies. Electoral reforms should minimize ethnic bloc voting and promote inclusive representation.

d. Public Institutions and Civil Service
Civil service, judiciary, law enforcement, and regulatory bodies must operate free from ethnic bias. Independent oversight mechanisms are essential to enforce compliance and accountability.

6. Strategies for Combating Tribalism in Governance

a. Legal Frameworks
Constitutions should codify anti-tribalism provisions, ensuring that appointments, promotions, and contracts are based on merit and equality.

b. Civic Education
Educational curricula should emphasize national identity, shared history, and civic responsibility to cultivate a culture that values competence over ethnic loyalty.

c. Civil Society and Media Engagement
Civil society organizations, youth movements, and media can monitor favoritism, hold leaders accountable, and educate citizens on the dangers of tribalism.

d. Inclusive Economic Policies
Government initiatives should promote equitable development across all regions, reducing perceptions of favoritism and fostering social cohesion.

            ++++++++++++++++++++++

Tribalism is not a minor social inconvenience; it is a fundamental barrier to social cohesion and prosperity in Nigeria and across Africa. Unchecked ethnic favoritism undermines governance, fuels conflict, distorts economic opportunities, and erodes trust in institutions. Without comprehensive reforms at every level of governance — national, regional, and local — social cohesion cannot be achieved, and economic prosperity will remain uneven and fragile.

Addressing tribalism requires a multi-pronged approach: legal enforcement of anti-tribalism and anti-nepotism provisions, civic education to foster national identity, merit-based appointments and economic opportunities, and vigilant civil society and media oversight. Only by confronting tribalism head-on can African nations hope to build inclusive societies where citizens collaborate across ethnic lines, trust institutions, and contribute to sustainable development. Social cohesion and prosperity are mutually dependent, and neither is achievable if tribalism continues to dictate political, economic, and social life.