• Buy NDIS Consumables Online | Mediply Plus Australia

    Discover a wide range of NDIS consumables at Mediply Plus – your trusted Australian supplier. From daily personal care to medical supplies, we offer fast delivery, easy ordering, and NDIS-eligible products. Shop now to access top-quality items tailored for NDIS participants and support coordinators. Visit https://maps.app.goo.gl/BkV18jr9HKztcnBt5 for hassle-free shopping and expert customer support.
    Buy NDIS Consumables Online | Mediply Plus Australia Discover a wide range of NDIS consumables at Mediply Plus – your trusted Australian supplier. From daily personal care to medical supplies, we offer fast delivery, easy ordering, and NDIS-eligible products. Shop now to access top-quality items tailored for NDIS participants and support coordinators. Visit https://maps.app.goo.gl/BkV18jr9HKztcnBt5 for hassle-free shopping and expert customer support.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 618 Visualizações 0 Anterior
  • Hamas led group killed and kidnapped many that resulted in the Israeli invasion of Gaza. Why are radicals in and around European elite countries and mainly radical students in America protesting against Israel and not against Hamas a terrorist organisation?

    The protests observed in and around European countries and among students in America, which are predominantly critical of Israel's actions in Gaza, stem from a complex interplay of factors. While the October 7th attack by Hamas, which involved the killing and kidnapping of Israelis, is acknowledged as the immediate trigger for the Israeli invasion, protestors often highlight a broader context and a different set of concerns that lead them to focus their criticism on Israel.

    Here are some of the key reasons cited by analysts and the protestors themselves:

    Scale of Response and Civilian Casualties: A primary driver of the protests is the sheer scale of Palestinian casualties, including a high number of women and children, and the widespread destruction of infrastructure in Gaza resulting from Israel's military operations. Many protestors view Israel's response as disproportionate to the initial Hamas attack and a form of collective punishment against the entire Gazan population. The dire humanitarian crisis, including lack of food, water, and medical supplies, further fuels this outrage.



    Historical Context and Occupation: Protestors often frame the current conflict within the decades-long history of the Israeli-Palestinian struggle. They point to the ongoing Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories, the blockade of Gaza (in place since Hamas took control in 2007), settlement expansion, and the displacement of Palestinians as root causes of the conflict. From this perspective, Hamas's actions, while condemned by many, are sometimes seen as a violent manifestation of resistance against a prolonged occupation.

    Perceived Power Imbalance: There's a strong perception among protestors of a significant power imbalance between Israel, a state with a sophisticated military and strong international allies (particularly the United States), and the Palestinians, who lack a state and comparable military or economic power. This leads many to sympathize with the Palestinians as the weaker party and to scrutinize the actions of the more powerful entity more intensely.

    Accountability of State Actors: Protestors often argue that states, like Israel, should be held to a higher standard of accountability under international law and human rights conventions than non-state actors like Hamas. They focus on the actions of the Israeli government and military, demanding adherence to international humanitarian law and investigations into alleged war crimes.

    Criticism of Western Foreign Policy: In many Western countries, especially the United States, protests against Israeli actions are also implicitly or explicitly a critique of their own government's foreign policy. This includes long-standing military aid to Israel, diplomatic support, and perceived unwillingness to hold Israel accountable for actions that draw international criticism. Protestors often demand that their governments take a stronger stance against Israeli policies and advocate for a ceasefire and Palestinian rights.

    Distinction Between Hamas and the Palestinian People: Many protestors emphasize that their criticism of Israeli policy is not an endorsement of Hamas. They state they are advocating for the human rights and self-determination of the Palestinian people, who are seen as victims of both Hamas's rule in Gaza and Israeli military actions. However, critics of the protests often argue that there isn't sufficient condemnation of Hamas's ideology and tactics by these groups.

    Concerns over "Genocide" or "Ethnic Cleansing": Some protestors and activist groups have adopted strong language, accusing Israel of committing acts tantamount to genocide or ethnic cleansing in Gaza. Such severe accusations galvanize intense opposition to Israeli policies and actions.

    It's important to note that the motivations and views within these protest movements are diverse. While the predominant focus has been on criticizing Israel's conduct, this does not universally mean an absence of condemnation for Hamas's October 7th attack. However, the emphasis of the protests has largely been on the devastating humanitarian impact of the subsequent Israeli military campaign in Gaza and the broader historical context of the conflict.
    The protests observed in some European countries and among students in America following the Hamas-led attacks on October 7th and the subsequent Israeli military operations in Gaza are driven by a complex set of factors. While these protests are often characterized by their strong criticism of Israel, the reasons for not focusing equally or primarily on Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, are multifaceted.

    Here are some of the key perspectives and motivations often cited by or attributed to these protestors:

    Focus on State Actions and Asymmetry of Power:
    Many protestors view Israel as a powerful state actor with a sophisticated military, often supported by Western governments (including their own). They focus their criticism on what they perceive as a disproportionate response by the Israeli military, leading to a high number of civilian casualties and a humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
    The significant power imbalance between Israel and the Palestinians, particularly Hamas in Gaza, leads many protestors to hold the more powerful entity to a higher standard of accountability for its actions and their impact on civilians.

    Humanitarian Concerns and Civilian Casualties:
    The sheer scale of death and destruction in Gaza, including the deaths of thousands of children and women, and the dire humanitarian situation (lack of food, water, medical supplies, and shelter) are primary drivers for many protestors. Their focus is often on stopping the immediate suffering and calling for a ceasefire.

    Historical Context and Occupation:
    Protestors frequently frame the current conflict within the broader historical context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including the ongoing occupation of Palestinian territories, the blockade of Gaza, the expansion of Israeli settlements, and the displacement of Palestinians. From this perspective, Hamas's actions, while not necessarily condoned, are sometimes seen as a consequence of or resistance to this long-standing situation.

    Criticism of Own Government's Policies:
    In the U.S. and some European countries, protestors often criticize their own governments' foreign policies, including military aid to Israel, arms sales, and diplomatic support, which they see as enabling Israeli actions. Their protests are, in part, a demand for their own governments to exert pressure on Israel or change their supportive stance.
    Calls for Divestment and Boycott (BDS Movement):

    Many student protests, in particular, are linked to the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, which calls for broad-based economic, academic, and cultural boycotts of Israel until it complies with international law and Palestinian rights. These campaigns inherently focus on Israeli institutions and policies.

    Perception of War Crimes and International Law:
    Protestors often accuse Israel of committing war crimes and violating international humanitarian law in its military operations in Gaza. They call for investigations and accountability through international bodies.

    Differing Views on Hamas:
    While Hamas is designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S., EU, and other countries, and its targeting of civilians on October 7th was widely condemned, some protestors may have a more nuanced or critical view of this designation in the context of what they see as an anti-colonial or resistance struggle.

    It's also important to note that some protestors or groups do condemn Hamas's actions but choose to focus their activism on the actions of Israel, which they see as a state with greater power and responsibility, and potentially more susceptible to international pressure or pressure from their own governments.
    For some, the demand to explicitly condemn Hamas before criticizing Israel is viewed as a tactic to deflect attention from Israeli actions.

    Free Speech and Anti-War Stance:
    Many protestors are driven by a broader anti-war sentiment and a commitment to free speech, advocating for the rights of Palestinians and criticizing what they see as oppression.
    It's crucial to understand that these protest movements are not monolithic. Participants come from diverse backgrounds, including Jewish students and groups who are critical of Israeli government policies. Their motivations can vary, but a common thread is often a focus on the severe humanitarian impact of the conflict on Palestinians in Gaza and a critique of Israeli state policies, viewed through lenses of human rights, international law, and social justice.

    The charge that these protests are antisemitic is a contentious issue. While protest organizers often explicitly state their opposition to antisemitism, some incidents of antisemitic rhetoric or actions have been reported at or around these protests, leading to concerns for the safety and well-being of Jewish communities. Conversely, many protestors, including Jewish participants, argue that criticism of Israeli government policies should not be conflated with antisemitism.

    By Jo Ikeji-Uju
    https://afriprime.net/pages/Anything

    Hamas led group killed and kidnapped many that resulted in the Israeli invasion of Gaza. Why are radicals in and around European elite countries and mainly radical students in America protesting against Israel and not against Hamas a terrorist organisation? The protests observed in and around European countries and among students in America, which are predominantly critical of Israel's actions in Gaza, stem from a complex interplay of factors. While the October 7th attack by Hamas, which involved the killing and kidnapping of Israelis, is acknowledged as the immediate trigger for the Israeli invasion, protestors often highlight a broader context and a different set of concerns that lead them to focus their criticism on Israel. Here are some of the key reasons cited by analysts and the protestors themselves: Scale of Response and Civilian Casualties: A primary driver of the protests is the sheer scale of Palestinian casualties, including a high number of women and children, and the widespread destruction of infrastructure in Gaza resulting from Israel's military operations. Many protestors view Israel's response as disproportionate to the initial Hamas attack and a form of collective punishment against the entire Gazan population. The dire humanitarian crisis, including lack of food, water, and medical supplies, further fuels this outrage. Historical Context and Occupation: Protestors often frame the current conflict within the decades-long history of the Israeli-Palestinian struggle. They point to the ongoing Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories, the blockade of Gaza (in place since Hamas took control in 2007), settlement expansion, and the displacement of Palestinians as root causes of the conflict. From this perspective, Hamas's actions, while condemned by many, are sometimes seen as a violent manifestation of resistance against a prolonged occupation. Perceived Power Imbalance: There's a strong perception among protestors of a significant power imbalance between Israel, a state with a sophisticated military and strong international allies (particularly the United States), and the Palestinians, who lack a state and comparable military or economic power. This leads many to sympathize with the Palestinians as the weaker party and to scrutinize the actions of the more powerful entity more intensely. Accountability of State Actors: Protestors often argue that states, like Israel, should be held to a higher standard of accountability under international law and human rights conventions than non-state actors like Hamas. They focus on the actions of the Israeli government and military, demanding adherence to international humanitarian law and investigations into alleged war crimes. Criticism of Western Foreign Policy: In many Western countries, especially the United States, protests against Israeli actions are also implicitly or explicitly a critique of their own government's foreign policy. This includes long-standing military aid to Israel, diplomatic support, and perceived unwillingness to hold Israel accountable for actions that draw international criticism. Protestors often demand that their governments take a stronger stance against Israeli policies and advocate for a ceasefire and Palestinian rights. Distinction Between Hamas and the Palestinian People: Many protestors emphasize that their criticism of Israeli policy is not an endorsement of Hamas. They state they are advocating for the human rights and self-determination of the Palestinian people, who are seen as victims of both Hamas's rule in Gaza and Israeli military actions. However, critics of the protests often argue that there isn't sufficient condemnation of Hamas's ideology and tactics by these groups. Concerns over "Genocide" or "Ethnic Cleansing": Some protestors and activist groups have adopted strong language, accusing Israel of committing acts tantamount to genocide or ethnic cleansing in Gaza. Such severe accusations galvanize intense opposition to Israeli policies and actions. It's important to note that the motivations and views within these protest movements are diverse. While the predominant focus has been on criticizing Israel's conduct, this does not universally mean an absence of condemnation for Hamas's October 7th attack. However, the emphasis of the protests has largely been on the devastating humanitarian impact of the subsequent Israeli military campaign in Gaza and the broader historical context of the conflict. The protests observed in some European countries and among students in America following the Hamas-led attacks on October 7th and the subsequent Israeli military operations in Gaza are driven by a complex set of factors. While these protests are often characterized by their strong criticism of Israel, the reasons for not focusing equally or primarily on Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, are multifaceted. Here are some of the key perspectives and motivations often cited by or attributed to these protestors: Focus on State Actions and Asymmetry of Power: Many protestors view Israel as a powerful state actor with a sophisticated military, often supported by Western governments (including their own). They focus their criticism on what they perceive as a disproportionate response by the Israeli military, leading to a high number of civilian casualties and a humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The significant power imbalance between Israel and the Palestinians, particularly Hamas in Gaza, leads many protestors to hold the more powerful entity to a higher standard of accountability for its actions and their impact on civilians. Humanitarian Concerns and Civilian Casualties: The sheer scale of death and destruction in Gaza, including the deaths of thousands of children and women, and the dire humanitarian situation (lack of food, water, medical supplies, and shelter) are primary drivers for many protestors. Their focus is often on stopping the immediate suffering and calling for a ceasefire. Historical Context and Occupation: Protestors frequently frame the current conflict within the broader historical context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including the ongoing occupation of Palestinian territories, the blockade of Gaza, the expansion of Israeli settlements, and the displacement of Palestinians. From this perspective, Hamas's actions, while not necessarily condoned, are sometimes seen as a consequence of or resistance to this long-standing situation. Criticism of Own Government's Policies: In the U.S. and some European countries, protestors often criticize their own governments' foreign policies, including military aid to Israel, arms sales, and diplomatic support, which they see as enabling Israeli actions. Their protests are, in part, a demand for their own governments to exert pressure on Israel or change their supportive stance. Calls for Divestment and Boycott (BDS Movement): Many student protests, in particular, are linked to the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, which calls for broad-based economic, academic, and cultural boycotts of Israel until it complies with international law and Palestinian rights. These campaigns inherently focus on Israeli institutions and policies. Perception of War Crimes and International Law: Protestors often accuse Israel of committing war crimes and violating international humanitarian law in its military operations in Gaza. They call for investigations and accountability through international bodies. Differing Views on Hamas: While Hamas is designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S., EU, and other countries, and its targeting of civilians on October 7th was widely condemned, some protestors may have a more nuanced or critical view of this designation in the context of what they see as an anti-colonial or resistance struggle. It's also important to note that some protestors or groups do condemn Hamas's actions but choose to focus their activism on the actions of Israel, which they see as a state with greater power and responsibility, and potentially more susceptible to international pressure or pressure from their own governments. For some, the demand to explicitly condemn Hamas before criticizing Israel is viewed as a tactic to deflect attention from Israeli actions. Free Speech and Anti-War Stance: Many protestors are driven by a broader anti-war sentiment and a commitment to free speech, advocating for the rights of Palestinians and criticizing what they see as oppression. It's crucial to understand that these protest movements are not monolithic. Participants come from diverse backgrounds, including Jewish students and groups who are critical of Israeli government policies. Their motivations can vary, but a common thread is often a focus on the severe humanitarian impact of the conflict on Palestinians in Gaza and a critique of Israeli state policies, viewed through lenses of human rights, international law, and social justice. The charge that these protests are antisemitic is a contentious issue. While protest organizers often explicitly state their opposition to antisemitism, some incidents of antisemitic rhetoric or actions have been reported at or around these protests, leading to concerns for the safety and well-being of Jewish communities. Conversely, many protestors, including Jewish participants, argue that criticism of Israeli government policies should not be conflated with antisemitism. By Jo Ikeji-Uju https://afriprime.net/pages/Anything
    AFRIPRIME.NET
    Anything Goes
    Share your memories, connect with others, make new friends
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3KB Visualizações 0 Anterior
  • Reviving Local Economies in Africa through Strategic Industrial Development & SME Empowerment:-

    SECTION 1: Identifying Strategic Sectors for Growth
    Objective:
    To select and develop priority industries that align with a country’s natural resources, market demand, workforce potential, and ability to reduce import dependence.

    Why This Matters-
    Africa’s industrial base is narrow and often focused on raw exports (like cocoa, oil, or minerals) with little local value addition. Identifying strategic sectors allows countries to:
    Increase domestic production capacity
    Reduce import dependence
    Generate mass employment
    Encourage innovation and entrepreneurship

    Criteria for Sector Selection
    Criteria- Description
    Raw Material Availability Is the resource locally available and underutilized?
    Job Creation Potential- Can it employ large numbers, especially youth and women?
    Market Demand Is there strong local or regional demand for the product/service?
    Export Potential- Can it feed into regional/global markets like AfCFTA or EU?
    Technology Compatibility- Can it adopt scalable, affordable technologies?

    Recommended Strategic Sectors
    1. Agro-processing
    Turn crops into consumer products: cassava into flour, mangoes into juice, etc.
    Benefits: Adds value locally, creates rural jobs, supports food security.
    Needs: Basic machinery, training, access to packaging materials.

    2. Textiles & Apparel
    Build on cotton-growing regions to create garments, uniforms, local fabrics.
    Benefits: High labor absorption, especially for women.
    Needs: Stitching machines, dyeing facilities, design training.

    3. Construction Materials
    Use local stone, clay, sand, and recycling to produce bricks, tiles, roofing sheets.
    Benefits: Urbanization demands housing; job-rich industry.
    Needs: Local fabrication plants, partnerships with builders.

    4. Green Energy Manufacturing
    Assemble/install solar panels, batteries, cookstoves, microgrids.
    Benefits: Energy access + sustainable jobs.
    Needs: Investment in clean tech skills and basic R&D.

    5. Pharmaceuticals & Medical Supplies
    Focus on production of generics, basic drugs, PPEs, hand sanitizers.
    Benefits: National health resilience + cost savings.
    Needs: Quality labs, regulatory support, training for pharmacists.

    6. Digital Economy (Tech & Services)
    Software development, e-commerce, digital financial services, AI/local apps.
    Benefits: Exportable skills, youth-driven, scalable.
    Needs: Coding academies, fast internet, local funding.

    SECTION 2: Support for Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
    Objective:
    To make SMEs the engine of economic growth, job creation, and industrial transformation.

    Why SMEs Matter
    SMEs contribute up to 80% of employment in many African countries.
    They operate in informal to semi-formal sectors but struggle due to:
    Lack of financing
    Limited access to tools, raw materials
    Weak infrastructure
    Low market visibility

    Key Areas of SME Support-
    1. Finance Access
    Strategy- Description
    Micro-loans & Cooperatives- Seed funding through credit unions, SACCOs, or faith-based funds
    SME Banks or Funds- Government/NGO-backed loan windows with flexible terms
    Equipment Leasing- Allow SMEs to rent industrial machines instead of buying
    Avoid high-interest commercial loans with strict collateral requirements.

    2. Infrastructure & Tools-
    Build shared industrial workspaces or parks for:
    Textile production-
    Metalwork-
    Agro-processing
    Provide mobile tool trucks for rural businesses.
    Ensure stable electricity, roads, and internet access.

    3. Training & Capacity Building-
    Partner with TVETs to offer:
    Technical skills (e.g., tailoring, baking, solar tech)
    Business management (pricing, inventory, marketing)
    Financial literacy (bookkeeping, savings)
    Create entrepreneurship bootcamps with mentorship.

    4. Market Access Support-
    Organize Buy Local fairs and online platforms for SME products.
    Help SMEs comply with export standards (packaging, hygiene, labeling).
    Link SMEs to school feeding programs, hospitals, and state procurement.

    5. Policy & Regulation Reform-
    Simplify business registration processes.
    Exempt small producers from high taxes for first 3–5 years.
    Create local content laws that mandate use of local products in public projects.

    6. Digital Enablement-
    Train SMEs to:
    Sell via afriprime.net, sappertask.com, corkroo.com because these sites are made for Africa by African.
    Accept mobile payments (M-Pesa, Flutterwave, etc.).
    Use digital bookkeeping apps.
    Going digital helps small businesses compete and scale.
    Case Study Snapshot: Nigeria’s MSME Clinics
    Mobile clinics hosted in states to connect SMEs with banks, regulators, and tools.
    Results: More registrations, loan disbursement, and skills training uptake.

    Conclusion
    Reviving African economies requires a clear sector focus matched with ground-up SME empowerment. By:
    Investing in strategic, job-rich industries, and
    Creating an ecosystem for SMEs to thrive,
    countries can reduce poverty, grow local wealth, and reclaim economic independence from global overdependence.

    By Jo Ikeji-Uju.
    sappertekinc@gmail.com
    https://afriprime.net/Ikeji
    *Share your comments positive or negative........
    Reviving Local Economies in Africa through Strategic Industrial Development & SME Empowerment:- SECTION 1: Identifying Strategic Sectors for Growth Objective: To select and develop priority industries that align with a country’s natural resources, market demand, workforce potential, and ability to reduce import dependence. Why This Matters- Africa’s industrial base is narrow and often focused on raw exports (like cocoa, oil, or minerals) with little local value addition. Identifying strategic sectors allows countries to: Increase domestic production capacity Reduce import dependence Generate mass employment Encourage innovation and entrepreneurship Criteria for Sector Selection Criteria- Description Raw Material Availability Is the resource locally available and underutilized? Job Creation Potential- Can it employ large numbers, especially youth and women? Market Demand Is there strong local or regional demand for the product/service? Export Potential- Can it feed into regional/global markets like AfCFTA or EU? Technology Compatibility- Can it adopt scalable, affordable technologies? Recommended Strategic Sectors 1. Agro-processing Turn crops into consumer products: cassava into flour, mangoes into juice, etc. Benefits: Adds value locally, creates rural jobs, supports food security. Needs: Basic machinery, training, access to packaging materials. 2. Textiles & Apparel Build on cotton-growing regions to create garments, uniforms, local fabrics. Benefits: High labor absorption, especially for women. Needs: Stitching machines, dyeing facilities, design training. 3. Construction Materials Use local stone, clay, sand, and recycling to produce bricks, tiles, roofing sheets. Benefits: Urbanization demands housing; job-rich industry. Needs: Local fabrication plants, partnerships with builders. 4. Green Energy Manufacturing Assemble/install solar panels, batteries, cookstoves, microgrids. Benefits: Energy access + sustainable jobs. Needs: Investment in clean tech skills and basic R&D. 5. Pharmaceuticals & Medical Supplies Focus on production of generics, basic drugs, PPEs, hand sanitizers. Benefits: National health resilience + cost savings. Needs: Quality labs, regulatory support, training for pharmacists. 6. Digital Economy (Tech & Services) Software development, e-commerce, digital financial services, AI/local apps. Benefits: Exportable skills, youth-driven, scalable. Needs: Coding academies, fast internet, local funding. SECTION 2: Support for Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Objective: To make SMEs the engine of economic growth, job creation, and industrial transformation. Why SMEs Matter SMEs contribute up to 80% of employment in many African countries. They operate in informal to semi-formal sectors but struggle due to: Lack of financing Limited access to tools, raw materials Weak infrastructure Low market visibility Key Areas of SME Support- 1. Finance Access Strategy- Description Micro-loans & Cooperatives- Seed funding through credit unions, SACCOs, or faith-based funds SME Banks or Funds- Government/NGO-backed loan windows with flexible terms Equipment Leasing- Allow SMEs to rent industrial machines instead of buying Avoid high-interest commercial loans with strict collateral requirements. 2. Infrastructure & Tools- Build shared industrial workspaces or parks for: Textile production- Metalwork- Agro-processing Provide mobile tool trucks for rural businesses. Ensure stable electricity, roads, and internet access. 3. Training & Capacity Building- Partner with TVETs to offer: Technical skills (e.g., tailoring, baking, solar tech) Business management (pricing, inventory, marketing) Financial literacy (bookkeeping, savings) Create entrepreneurship bootcamps with mentorship. 4. Market Access Support- Organize Buy Local fairs and online platforms for SME products. Help SMEs comply with export standards (packaging, hygiene, labeling). Link SMEs to school feeding programs, hospitals, and state procurement. 5. Policy & Regulation Reform- Simplify business registration processes. Exempt small producers from high taxes for first 3–5 years. Create local content laws that mandate use of local products in public projects. 6. Digital Enablement- Train SMEs to: Sell via afriprime.net, sappertask.com, corkroo.com because these sites are made for Africa by African. Accept mobile payments (M-Pesa, Flutterwave, etc.). Use digital bookkeeping apps. Going digital helps small businesses compete and scale. Case Study Snapshot: Nigeria’s MSME Clinics Mobile clinics hosted in states to connect SMEs with banks, regulators, and tools. Results: More registrations, loan disbursement, and skills training uptake. Conclusion Reviving African economies requires a clear sector focus matched with ground-up SME empowerment. By: Investing in strategic, job-rich industries, and Creating an ecosystem for SMEs to thrive, countries can reduce poverty, grow local wealth, and reclaim economic independence from global overdependence. By Jo Ikeji-Uju. sappertekinc@gmail.com https://afriprime.net/Ikeji *Share your comments positive or negative........
    AFRIPRIME.NET
    Ikeji
    "Those who believe they can do something and those who believe they can't are both right"
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 4KB Visualizações 0 Anterior
  • surgical suppliers Jajoo Surgical is a trusted name in the healthcare industry, offering high-quality medical disposables for over two decades. As a leading manufacturer, they specialize in surgical cotton, gauze swabs, bandages, and other essential medical supplies. https://jajoosurgical.com/ #surgicalsupplier #medicaldisposablesmanufacturer #medicaldisposablemanufacturersinindia
    surgical suppliers Jajoo Surgical is a trusted name in the healthcare industry, offering high-quality medical disposables for over two decades. As a leading manufacturer, they specialize in surgical cotton, gauze swabs, bandages, and other essential medical supplies. https://jajoosurgical.com/ #surgicalsupplier #medicaldisposablesmanufacturer #medicaldisposablemanufacturersinindia
    JAJOOSURGICAL.COM
    Home Renew
    Jajoo Surgical is a leading surgical supplier and medical disposables manufacturer in India. Specialist in the healthcare industry for more than two decades.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1KB Visualizações 0 Anterior
  • Armenia seeks EU aid for refugees from Nagorno-Karabakh, Italy says.
    Armenia has asked the European Union for assistance to help it deal with refugees arriving from Nagorno-Karabakh since Azerbaijan took back control of the region last week, the office of Italy's prime minister said on Saturday.

    Nagorno-Karabakh is internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan but is populated mainly by Armenian Christians who set up the self-styled Republic of Artsakh three decades ago after a bloody ethnic conflict as the Soviet Union collapsed.

    More than 100,000 refugees have arrived in Armenia since Azerbaijan launched a military operation to retake control of Nagorno-Karabakh, the head of the U.N. refugee agency (UNHCR) said late on Friday.

    Armenia has asked the EU for temporary shelters and medical supplies, the Italian prime minister's office said in a statement, adding that Rome working to promote stabilisation in the region.
    Armenia seeks EU aid for refugees from Nagorno-Karabakh, Italy says. Armenia has asked the European Union for assistance to help it deal with refugees arriving from Nagorno-Karabakh since Azerbaijan took back control of the region last week, the office of Italy's prime minister said on Saturday. Nagorno-Karabakh is internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan but is populated mainly by Armenian Christians who set up the self-styled Republic of Artsakh three decades ago after a bloody ethnic conflict as the Soviet Union collapsed. More than 100,000 refugees have arrived in Armenia since Azerbaijan launched a military operation to retake control of Nagorno-Karabakh, the head of the U.N. refugee agency (UNHCR) said late on Friday. Armenia has asked the EU for temporary shelters and medical supplies, the Italian prime minister's office said in a statement, adding that Rome working to promote stabilisation in the region.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2KB Visualizações 0 Anterior
Patrocinado
google-site-verification: google037b30823fc02426.html
Patrocinado
google-site-verification: google037b30823fc02426.html