Beijing’s Kyodo News reported June 29 that China is planning to invite President Trump to attend a military parade at Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3.

The event marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II under the banner of the “Commemoration of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.”

However, behind this seemingly historical commemoration lies a calculated political agenda by Beijing: the distortion of history and an ambition to challenge the free world.

Every international visit by a U.S. president carries deep symbolic meaning. This event touches on the core of U.S.-China relations, America’s position on historical truth and the international order the U.S. upholds.

I therefore earnestly urge President Trump to weigh the following four considerations before making any final decision should Beijing extend an official invitation.

First, this parade is not a symbol of peace, but a strategic challenge to U.S.-Led Global Order. The Chinese Communist Party is not holding this parade merely to commemorate a historic victory. It is a deliberate display of military strength, aimed at projecting the narrative of Communist Party superiority and signaling strategic rivalry with the U.S.

Since 2015, the party has increasingly normalized large-scale military parades. Domestically, they glorify one-party rule; internationally, they serve as a geopolitical tool to intimidate neighbors. By showcasing hypersonic missiles, fifth-generation fighter jets and long-range nuclear strike capabilities, these parades are clearly targeted at undermining the leadership of the U.S. and the free world.

The Xi regime’s invitation to Trump is a calculated effort to present China as America’s equal on the global stage — conveying a vision of “co-governance of the world.” Should Trump attend, his presence may be exploited as an implicit endorsement of China’s military rise, thereby weakening America’s global standing and eroding the confidence of regional allies. As President Ronald Reagan said in his 1981 inaugural address, “Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.”

True strength lies not in weaponry, but in the spirit and conviction of free people. America’s greatness stems from its values — not from military displays. Moreover, the essence of a military parade should be to honor those who gave their lives in service. Just last month, Trump presided over the 250th anniversary celebration of the U.S. Army in Washington, fulfilling that solemn duty with dignity and honor. This would not be like that.

Second, the Chinese communists have falsified history and stolen the Nationalist government’s wartime legacy. There is no historical ambiguity regarding who bore the brunt of Japan’s invasion during World War II. Following the outbreak of the Pacific War in 1941, China became the principal theater of war in Asia. The Republic of China under Chiang Kai-shek’s leadership conducted over 90 percent of the major battles and suffered the bulk of casualties.

In contrast, the Communist Party operated largely in guerrilla warfare behind enemy lines, focused more on consolidating its own strength than on resisting Japan strategically. It was the Nationalist government’s sacrifices that initially earned the Republic of China a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council. Even after its retreat to Taiwan in 1949 following the civil war, the U.N. continued to recognize the Republic of China for nearly two more decades — underscoring its historical legitimacy.

After consolidating power, the Chinese Communist Party eliminated many of the generals and troops who had genuinely resisted Japan. Now, Beijing stages military parades as if it had been the actual victor, mocking the true heroes of World War II and engaging in historical theft of valor. If Trump were to attend, it would risk signaling U.S. endorsement of this manipulated narrative, creating the impression that America has accepted the Chinese Communist Party’s version of history.

Third, this parade dishonors fallen American soldiers from the Korean War. During World War II, the U.S. provided significant aid to China’s anti-Japanese efforts. Yet less than five years later, the Chinese communists sent over 1 million troops across the Yalu River to directly engage U.S.-led United Nations forces in the Korean War.

The Chinese Communist Party’s support for the Kim regime in North Korea was part of its strategy to establish regional dominance in East Asia. More than 36,000 American soldiers died in the Korean War, and over 100,000 were wounded. Even today, many American families continue to grieve the loss of loved ones.

The U.S. has always deeply honored its veterans and war dead — building monuments, museums and preserving their legacy in public memory. For a U.S. president to attend this parade would amount to public recognition of the very military that opened fire on American troops.

Trump understands the profound sacrifice of military service. He must also be made to understand that attending this parade could deeply wound the families and descendants of the fallen.

Finally, sharing a platform with Putin and Xi could send the wrong signal to the free world. Reports suggest that, because Xi attended Russia’s 80th anniversary parade for the Great Patriotic War in Moscow this last May, Russian President Vladimir Putin will return the favor by attending China’s parade in September. Both men are now seen across the free world as symbols of authoritarian expansionism.

Putin has invaded Ukraine and constantly threatens Europe. Xi, meanwhile, has escalated provocations in the South China Sea and around Taiwan, suppressed freedoms in Hong Kong and continues the persecution of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang and Tibet. His regime that is both militaristic and repressive.

Even if Trump does not share their goals, his standing alongside these two dictators at a military parade would be heavily exploited by Chinese and Russian media to depict an image of unity among the three powers. Such an image could damage global perceptions of the U.S. and undermine America’s moral standing as the beacon of freedom. It risks shaking allies’ trust in the values the U.S. represents.

Trump is unquestionably one of the most influential American presidents and global leaders of our time. He has firmly defended American interests and values, taken strong action against the Iranian regime, and shown deep respect for America’s military — earning widespread admiration at home and abroad.

Yes, diplomacy involves difficult trade-offs. But China’s invitation is not a normal diplomatic event. It is a stage crafted by an authoritarian regime to whitewash history and showcase military might — not in the pursuit of peace, but to control the global narrative.

By declining to attend, President Trump would send a powerful signal: that America stands for historical truth, democratic values and the shared honor of defending freedom with its allies.

Moreover, the Chinese Communist Party is currently under significant pressure from U.S. tariffs and technological sanctions. Its economy is more dependent on global markets than ever. This is not the time to offer Beijing symbolic concessions or legitimacy.

A wiser, stronger strategy would be to reserve a presidential visit to China for when Beijing demonstrates genuine reform, keeps its promises, curbs its aggression and halts its theft of American technology and commerce. Only then should a U.S. president visit — with moral authority and strategic advantage.

Trump, for the honor of the United States and in the name of historical responsibility, should firmly and respectfully decline this invitation.

Vincent C. Chen is a senior executive in Taiwan’s information and communications technology industry who serves as an advisory board member for Taiwan Thinktank and Foundation for Future Generations, Taiwan.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Lack of information on China super soldier experimentation ‘disturbing’: Ex-intelligence official

An ex-intelligence official said late Thursday that China’s military leaders are experimenting with creating a “super soldier,” calling the lack of information “disturbing.”

“Other nations have explored in this area over decades. So it’s not the newest thing in the world, but the more disturbing part [is] we don’t know exactly how much effort they’re putting in towards it,” Nicholas Eftimiades, a former senior intelligence officer in the Defense Intelligence Agency, said during an appearance on NewsNation’s “Elizabeth Vargas Reports.”

“We don’t know any of the accomplishments they’ve had towards it. We do know, which is disturbing, is that it’s under the People’s Liberation Army.”

Eftimiades said Beijing’s research is “promising,” but noted that little is known about gene splicing or personality altering efforts.

“They’ve been exploring this concept for a while. Can they modify human behavior, human physiology, to create, if you will, a more superior individual, physically as well as mentally?” he asked.

The remarks comes as China works to shore up military installments in Africa and elsewhere around the world amid a tense trade relationship with the United States and blossoming alliance with Russia.

However, Chinese Embassy Spokesperson Liu Pengyu said he was “unaware” of the “super soldiers” reports.

“China’s development strengthens the world’s forces for peace. No matter what stage of development it reaches, China will never seek hegemony or engage in expansionism,” he said in a statement to The Hill.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem earlier this week warned that China has capabilities to shut off U.S. water and electricity grids during remarks at the inaugural Hill Nation summit.

“Next time we detect a cyberhack from China, we kick some of their state-owned enterprises, multibillion-dollar state-owned enterprises, off the stock exchange and say, ‘You know what, no more investment from the United States period,’” Eftimiades said.

“And we coordinate that with our allies as well. So there is some cost to China, because as of right now, there’s not.”