1. A Display of Anti-Western Unity: The most prominent message of the parade was the visible alignment of China, Russia, and North Korea. This gathering of leaders from what some Western analysts have dubbed an "Axis of Upheaval" was a powerful visual statement of solidarity against the United States and its allies. The attendance of these leaders, particularly Kim Jong Un in his first multilateral diplomatic event, showcased a coalescing of non-Western powers with shared grievances against what they view as U.S. "hegemony" and "bullying."

2. Showcasing China's Military Might: The parade was China's largest-ever military procession and served as a platform to display its latest military hardware. The showcase included new hypersonic weapons, nuclear-capable missiles, laser weapons, and underwater drones. This display was not only intended for a domestic audience to instill national pride but also to send a clear message to the world, especially the U.S. and its neighbors, that China's military is a powerful and technologically advanced force capable of operating across all domains.

3. A Challenge to the U.S.-Led World Order: By hosting this event and assembling a guest list largely composed of leaders from the "Global South" and countries at odds with the West, China is signaling its ambition to reshape the international order. Chinese President Xi Jinping's remarks at the event, where he warned the world faces a "choice between peace or war" and declared that China "is never intimidated by any bullies," were seen as a direct challenge to the U.S.-led system. The parade also provided a counterpoint to the less-than-grand U.S. military parade held earlier in the year.

4. Cementing Alliances: The presence of Putin and Kim Jong Un, who are heavily sanctioned by Western nations, demonstrated China's willingness to stand by its allies. It also offered an opportunity for these leaders to solidify their partnerships. Putin's attendance, which came on the heels of a meeting with Xi at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit, underscored the "no limits partnership" between Russia and China. Kim's presence was seen as gaining implicit support for his nuclear program, which remains a subject of international sanctions.

5. Domestic and Historical Significance: While outwardly a message to the world, the parade also held deep domestic meaning. It was held to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and Japan's surrender, an event China refers to as the "War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression." This historical framing is a key part of the Chinese Communist Party's narrative, showcasing how the party has led the nation from a period of "deep crisis" to one of "great rejuvenation." This reinforces the party's legitimacy and Xi's leadership.

In summary, the parade was a carefully choreographed event designed to serve multiple purposes: to demonstrate China's growing military power, to forge a united front with key allies against the West, and to bolster domestic support for the Chinese Communist Party and President Xi Jinping's vision of a new world order.

“May President Xi and the wonderful people of China have a great and lasting day of celebration. Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against The United States of America,” Trump said. 

Based on recent reports, the statement you cited from Donald Trump appears to be a real social media post he made in response to China's military parade. The full context of his post included a sarcastic message wishing China a good celebration before adding, "Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against The United States of America."

The fact that Xi Jinping and other Chinese officials did not issue an immediate public reaction is not surprising. This kind of public, confrontational rhetoric is not the style of Chinese diplomacy, which tends to be more reserved and formal in its public responses.

The lack of a direct public response from Beijing can be interpreted in a few ways:

• Ignoring the Provocation: The Chinese government may have chosen to ignore the statement, as engaging with it could be seen as giving it undue importance or legitimacy. By not responding, they maintain a sense of diplomatic gravitas and avoid a public back-and-forth that could escalate tensions.

• Focusing on their Own Narrative: China's primary goal with the parade was to project a powerful image of itself as a global leader and a force for stability, in contrast to what it often frames as Western "bullying" and "unilateralism." A public spat with Trump would distract from that core message.

• Different Diplomatic Channels: It's also possible that any Chinese response was communicated through private, behind-the-scenes diplomatic channels rather than a public statement.

In contrast, a Kremlin foreign policy aide, Yuri Ushakov, did comment on the post, suggesting that Trump's words were not without irony and denying any conspiracy. This shows that while the Chinese government may have chosen to ignore the statement publicly, it was certainly noted by the participating leaders.

Ultimately, Trump's statement highlights the existing geopolitical tensions and the symbolic significance of the parade. The gathering of these leaders, who are often at odds with the United States, was already being viewed as a show of defiance, and Trump's comments simply made that subtext explicit.

China's military parade, particularly with the attendance of leaders like Putin and Kim Jong Un, served as a powerful and unambiguous signal to the world, and specifically to the United States and its European allies. The core message is that China is no longer a developing nation that will quietly integrate into the U.S.-led liberal international order. Instead, it is a great power with the intent and capacity to reshape that order.

Here are the key aspects of that message:

1. A New Global Order is Emerging: China's foreign policy under President Xi Jinping has become increasingly assertive, and the parade was a vivid illustration of this new direction. By bringing together leaders from countries that are often at odds with the West, China is visually demonstrating the existence of a coalition of states that are either dissatisfied with or actively seeking to challenge the U.S. and European elites. This is a direct promotion of a "multipolar" world, where power is not concentrated in the West, but is instead distributed among various centers, with Beijing at the heart of one of them.

2. Military Might as the Foundation of Geopolitical Clout: The sheer scale and technological sophistication of the weapons on display—hypersonic missiles, advanced drones, and other next-generation systems—were meant to show that China's military has reached a level where it can credibly challenge U.S. and allied forces. This is not just about defending its own territory; it's about projecting power and influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. The parade was a clear warning that any military confrontation, particularly over Taiwan, would be a high-cost, high-risk endeavor for the United States.

3. Economic and Political Alignment: Beyond the military display, the gathering of these leaders reinforced a broader economic and political realignment. For Russia, China's economic support is a lifeline in the face of Western sanctions. For North Korea, the visit signals China's willingness to support its neighbor despite international condemnation. The presence of other leaders from the "Global South" at the parade further suggests that China is building a network of influence that bypasses traditional Western alliances. This is happening through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative and new financial institutions that offer an alternative to Western-dominated ones.

4. A Challenge to Western Values: China, Russia, and North Korea, all authoritarian states, are united by a shared suspicion of Western-style democracy, human rights, and rule of law. The parade and the surrounding rhetoric were also a statement of ideological solidarity. They are presenting a model of governance that prioritizes state stability and economic development over individual freedoms, and they are seeking to promote this model as a viable alternative for other nations.

In short, the message is that China is no longer a "peer competitor" to the United States—it is a great power that is ready to lead a new coalition of countries in a direct challenge to the U.S.-led world order.

The parade was less a celebration of the past and more a declaration of the future, a future where the West's dominance is no longer a given.