The relationship between African political elites and the citizens who elect them is one of the most discussed paradoxes of modern governance on the continent. Election seasons often bring passionate promises, grand rhetoric about development, and a performance of humility before the people.

Yet, once the votes are cast and the leaders ascend to power, a visible gap often emerges between rulers and the ruled. This disconnection — political, social, and moral — has deep historical, structural, and psychological roots.

Understanding it requires looking beyond individual failures to the systemic incentives that shape African politics.

1. The Colonial Legacy of Power and Governance

The disconnection between African leaders and the masses did not begin in the modern democratic era. It is deeply rooted in the colonial state model. Colonial administrations were designed for extraction and control, not service or inclusion. The “government” was a distant authority, enforcing laws from above and exploiting resources without accountability to local populations.

When independence came, many African elites inherited these same centralized, top-down systems. Instead of dismantling them to create participatory governance, most post-independence leaders repurposed colonial institutions to serve their political survival. Power thus remained concentrated in a small elite class that views leadership not as stewardship, but as dominion. The colonial ruler was replaced by the African ruler — with the same distance from the governed.

2. Elections as a Path to Power, Not Service

For many political elites in Africa, elections are not viewed as a social contract but as a battle for access to state power and resources. The campaign period becomes a performance — full of slogans about “the people,” “development,” and “change” — while the underlying goal is to capture the machinery of government, which controls lucrative contracts, appointments, and access to wealth.

Once in office, these elites often see themselves as victors who must “enjoy the spoils.” In many cases, they must also repay the financial and political debts incurred during campaigns — to business sponsors, tribal power brokers, and political godfathers. Consequently, the immediate post-election period is not about fulfilling promises to the masses but about consolidating power, rewarding loyalty, and securing personal and party dominance. This transactional cycle naturally alienates the ruling elite from ordinary citizens.

3. Weak Institutions and Lack of Accountability

In societies where institutions are weak, the personal behavior of leaders dominates governance. African parliaments, courts, and anti-corruption bodies often lack the independence and power to hold leaders accountable. Civil society groups and journalists, though vibrant in many countries, face intimidation, legal restrictions, or co-optation through state patronage.

The result is a culture of impunity. Political elites know that once they are in power, the mechanisms meant to check their behavior are either captured or ineffective. Without real consequences for betrayal or corruption, leaders easily detach from the people’s needs. Their accountability shifts upward — to donors, foreign governments, or party bosses — rather than downward to the electorate.

4. Economic Incentives and the “Politics of Survival”

Politics in many African countries is not just about ideology or vision — it is often a survival strategy. The scarcity of economic opportunities makes political office one of the few routes to wealth and social mobility. When power becomes the gateway to prosperity, the competition for office intensifies, and public service becomes secondary to personal enrichment.

This “politics of survival” means that leaders use state resources to maintain loyalty within their networks rather than to deliver development. Public funds are diverted into patronage systems — paying allies, buying political support, and neutralizing opposition. Once in power, leaders must constantly feed this network to remain secure, leaving little incentive or space to engage meaningfully with citizens.

5. Social and Psychological Distance

Another layer of disconnection is psychological. Many African political elites live lifestyles vastly different from those of ordinary citizens. Once elected, they move into heavily guarded residences, drive luxury vehicles, and operate within insulated circles of advisers and business elites. Their children study abroad, their healthcare is foreign, and their daily realities are far removed from those of the voters they claim to represent.

This physical and social distance erodes empathy. Over time, leaders begin to view citizens not as partners in development but as subjects who must be managed or appeased. When protests arise, they interpret them as threats to power rather than cries for justice.

6. Ethnic and Regional Politics

Ethnicity remains a powerful factor in African political systems. During campaigns, politicians often mobilize ethnic identities to secure votes, promising to “bring development” to their own groups. However, once in power, the elite class tends to prioritize maintaining their political coalition over genuine inclusion. They selectively reward allies and neglect regions that did not vote for them.

This politicization of identity deepens divisions and fuels disillusionment among citizens who feel excluded. The ruling elite, meanwhile, uses these divisions to maintain control — ensuring that the people remain fragmented and unable to unite around shared national interests.

7. Foreign Influence and Donor Dependence

Another factor that widens the disconnect is the influence of external actors. Many African governments rely heavily on foreign aid, loans, and technical assistance. This dependence often shifts accountability from citizens to international partners. Leaders prioritize satisfying donor conditions and foreign investors over domestic needs because those relationships sustain their regimes financially and diplomatically.

This foreign-oriented governance model distances leaders from grassroots citizens. Development agendas become externally driven, and political legitimacy is often measured by international recognition rather than local approval.

8. Erosion of Civic Culture and Public Expectation

Over decades, many citizens have grown accustomed to this disconnect, leading to what some scholars call “learned helplessness.” When leaders repeatedly fail to deliver, people lower their expectations or resort to short-term benefits such as handouts during elections. This weakens civic culture and the demand for accountability. In such an environment, political elites face little sustained pressure to remain close to the people. Instead, loyalty becomes transactional — bought with temporary favors rather than earned through genuine service.

9. Media Control and Narrative Manipulation

In several African countries, the media — instead of being a watchdog — becomes part of the patronage system. State-owned media outlets glorify leaders and suppress criticism, while private outlets are sometimes bought off or threatened. This manipulation of information helps elites control public perception and mask their detachment from real issues. It creates a feedback loop where leaders believe their own propaganda and lose touch with the daily struggles of the people.

10. The Path Forward: Reconnecting Power to the People

Despite these challenges, the disconnection is not irreversible. Grassroots movements, youth-led protests, digital activism, and independent media are gradually reshaping political consciousness across Africa. Countries like Ghana, Kenya, and Senegal have seen citizens use social media and civic coalitions to demand greater transparency and responsiveness.

For genuine reconnection, African democracies must strengthen institutions that enforce accountability — from electoral commissions to anti-corruption agencies and independent judiciaries. Civic education should also be prioritized so that citizens understand their rights and responsibilities beyond election day. Leadership development programs should nurture ethical, service-minded leaders rather than opportunists chasing power.

                        ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The disconnection of African political elites from the people is not merely a moral failure but a structural one. It stems from historical legacies, weak institutions, and political economies built on patronage rather than performance. Until governance systems reward service over survival, and until citizens consistently demand accountability, this cycle will persist. Yet, the growing awareness among Africa’s youth, coupled with technological empowerment and civic mobilization, offers hope. The day African leaders see power not as privilege but as responsibility will mark the true liberation of the continent’s democracy.