The global narrative around electric vehicles (EVs) suggests an unstoppable march toward an all-electric future. Headlines highlight rising EV sales in wealthy countries, bold government bans on petrol cars, and ambitious climate pledges from automakers. Yet step outside a few high-income markets and the picture changes dramatically. In most of the world—across Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Latin America, and large parts of Eastern Europe—petrol (and diesel) cars continue to dominate roads, sales, and consumer preferences.
This persistence is not simply due to resistance to change or lack of awareness. It reflects deep structural realities: economics, infrastructure, energy systems, industrial capacity, and social behavior. Understanding why petrol cars remain dominant requires moving beyond hype and examining how mobility actually works for the majority of the global population.
1. Cost: The Decisive Barrier
The most immediate and decisive factor is price. EVs remain significantly more expensive upfront than comparable petrol vehicles, even after years of cost declines. While subsidies in rich countries narrow this gap, most governments in the world cannot afford large-scale EV incentives.
For consumers in low- and middle-income countries, purchasing decisions are brutally pragmatic. A petrol car with a lower upfront cost—even if it has higher long-term fuel and maintenance expenses—is often the only viable option. Many buyers operate on tight budgets, limited access to credit, and informal income streams that make financing expensive EVs unrealistic.
Second-hand markets further reinforce petrol dominance. Used petrol cars are abundant, cheap, and repairable. Used EV markets, by contrast, remain thin and risky, with battery degradation uncertainty and high replacement costs that deter buyers.
2. Infrastructure Reality: Charging Is Not Fueling
EV advocates often assume charging infrastructure will “naturally” follow adoption. In practice, charging requires reliable electricity, grid capacity, land access, and maintenance—conditions that are far from universal.
In many regions:
-
Electricity supply is intermittent or unreliable.
-
Power outages are frequent.
-
Grid coverage in rural or peri-urban areas is weak.
-
Voltage stability is insufficient for fast charging.
Petrol infrastructure, on the other hand, is mature, decentralized, and resilient. Fuel can be transported by truck, stored easily, and sold in small quantities. A petrol station can operate with minimal electricity and limited technical expertise. This makes petrol uniquely suited to environments with weak infrastructure.
For millions of people living in informal settlements or apartment blocks without private parking, home charging—the backbone of EV convenience in wealthy countries—is simply not an option.
3. Energy Source Paradox: EVs Are Only as Clean as the Grid
In much of the world, electricity generation remains dominated by coal, oil, or inefficient diesel generators. In such contexts, EVs do not eliminate emissions; they shift emissions from tailpipes to power plants.
When electricity is expensive or unreliable, charging an EV can cost as much—or more—than fueling a petrol car. In regions dependent on diesel generators, EVs can even increase local pollution indirectly.
Petrol cars, for all their flaws, operate independently of grid quality. This autonomy is a hidden advantage in countries where energy systems are fragile or politicized.
4. Maintenance, Skills, and Repair Culture
Petrol vehicles benefit from a century-old global repair ecosystem. Mechanics are everywhere, spare parts are widely available, and repairs can often be improvised. This matters enormously in environments where formal service centers are scarce and vehicles must be kept running under harsh conditions.
EVs, by contrast, are software- and electronics-intensive machines. Diagnosing faults often requires proprietary tools, trained technicians, and access to manufacturer-controlled systems. Battery failures, in particular, are catastrophic from a cost perspective.
For many users, especially commercial drivers, farmers, and informal transport operators, downtime equals lost income. Petrol vehicles offer predictability and repairability that EVs have not yet matched globally.
5. Fuel Flexibility and Informal Economies
Petrol integrates seamlessly into informal and semi-formal economies. Fuel can be purchased in small quantities, transported in containers, and sold in decentralized ways. While this is inefficient and sometimes unsafe, it matches the realities of many societies.
EV charging, by contrast, is formal by design. It requires metered electricity, standardized connectors, and regulated infrastructure. This rigidity clashes with environments where informality is not a choice but a necessity.
In rural areas, petrol vehicles can carry extra fuel and travel long distances without concern for charger availability. Range anxiety is not a psychological issue there; it is a survival concern.
6. Vehicle Use Patterns: The World Is Not Silicon Valley
Much EV marketing assumes usage patterns common in wealthy urban centers: short daily commutes, private garages, stable incomes, and predictable routines. Globally, these assumptions do not hold.
In many countries, vehicles are:
-
Overloaded beyond design limits.
-
Driven on poor or unpaved roads.
-
Used intensively for commercial purposes.
-
Kept for 15–25 years with multiple owners.
Petrol engines are well-understood in these conditions. EVs, with heavy battery packs, sensitivity to heat, and limited service networks, face trust deficits in extreme climates and demanding use cases.
7. Policy Mismatch and External Pressure
Many EV mandates are imported from wealthy countries with vastly different conditions. When developing nations adopt similar targets without underlying infrastructure or industrial capacity, the result is often symbolic policy rather than practical transformation.
This creates resistance. Consumers perceive EVs not as empowerment tools but as elite projects imposed from above or abroad. In contrast, petrol cars are familiar, accessible, and culturally embedded.
8. Industrial and Employment Considerations
Petrol vehicle ecosystems support millions of jobs worldwide—mechanics, parts traders, fuel distributors, transport operators. A rapid shift to EVs threatens these livelihoods without offering clear alternatives.
Governments are understandably cautious. Social stability often outweighs abstract long-term gains, especially in economies with high unemployment and limited social safety nets.
9. The Used Vehicle Pipeline
One of the least discussed realities is that most of the world relies on imported used vehicles from richer countries. These vehicles are overwhelmingly petrol or diesel. EVs are not yet flowing into these markets at scale, and when they do, battery health concerns make them unattractive.
As long as this pipeline exists, petrol cars will dominate.
Conclusion: Hype vs. Ground Truth
Petrol cars still dominate globally not because EVs are bad technology, but because technology does not exist in a vacuum. It operates within economic constraints, infrastructure limits, cultural practices, and political realities.
For most of the world, petrol vehicles currently offer:
-
Lower upfront costs
-
Flexible fueling
-
Repairability
-
Infrastructure independence
-
Proven durability
Until EVs can match these attributes—without heavy subsidies or ideal conditions—petrol cars will remain the default choice for billions of people.
The real risk is not that the world is “behind” on EV adoption. The real risk is designing global mobility policy based on the experience of a minority, while ignoring the lived realities of the majority. The future of transport will likely be plural, uneven, and context-specific—not a one-size-fits-all electric utopia.
Leave a Reply